Condonation of Delay denied: communication lapses and corporate restructuring found insufficient; prolonged inaction and lack of bona fides led to ref...
Export Support intervention INSIGHT launched to provide non financial capacity building, trade intelligence and pilot support with defined funding and...
At admission of a CIRP petition the tribunal cannot decide liquidated damages by summary procedure; such claims are not amenable to summary determination and therefore do not justify denial of admission on that ground alone. Pre-existing contractual disputes about quality and defects, if shown to be substantial, genuine and bona fide (not spurious, speculative or misconceived), can bar admission of a Section 9 application; numerous pre-demand communications indicating defects support that finding. A completion certificate issued with caveats does not amount to unconditional acceptance and does not foreclose contractual disputes. The appeal challenging these conclusions was dismissed.
At admission of a CIRP petition the tribunal cannot decide liquidated damages by summary procedure; such claims are not amenable to summary determination and therefore do not justify denial of admission on that ground alone. Pre-existing contractual disputes about quality and defects, if shown to be substantial, genuine and bona fide (not spurious, speculative or misconceived), can bar admission of a Section 9 application; numerous pre-demand communications indicating defects support that finding. A completion certificate issued with caveats does not amount to unconditional acceptance and does not foreclose contractual disputes. The appeal challenging these conclusions was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.