Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5281 to 5300 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
At admission of a CIRP petition the tribunal cannot decide liquidated damages by summary procedure; such claims are not amenable to summary determination and therefore do not justify denial of admission on that ground alone. Pre-existing contractual disputes about quality and defects, if shown to be substantial, genuine and bona fide (not spurious, speculative or misconceived), can bar admission of a Section 9 application; numerous pre-demand communications indicating defects support that finding. A completion certificate issued with caveats does not amount to unconditional acceptance and does not foreclose contractual disputes. The appeal challenging these conclusions was dismissed.
At admission of a CIRP petition the tribunal cannot decide liquidated damages by summary procedure; such claims are not amenable to summary determination and therefore do not justify denial of admission on that ground alone. Pre-existing contractual disputes about quality and defects, if shown to be substantial, genuine and bona fide (not spurious, speculative or misconceived), can bar admission of a Section 9 application; numerous pre-demand communications indicating defects support that finding. A completion certificate issued with caveats does not amount to unconditional acceptance and does not foreclose contractual disputes. The appeal challenging these conclusions was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.