Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (section reference omitted) was contested on date-of-default and limitation grounds but the dispute turned on an executed MOU, acknowledged receipt of funds, continuous failure to perform, and an arbitral award rendered as an executable decree. The award's finality and enforceability was treated as operative for limitation (a subsequent suo motu writ order was invoked in support). Non appearance and ex parte proceedings before the arbitral forum and tribunal informed findings on the corporate debtor's conduct and intention, and the appellate challenge was dismissed as lacking merit.
Admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (section reference omitted) was contested on date-of-default and limitation grounds but the dispute turned on an executed MOU, acknowledged receipt of funds, continuous failure to perform, and an arbitral award rendered as an executable decree. The award's finality and enforceability was treated as operative for limitation (a subsequent suo motu writ order was invoked in support). Non appearance and ex parte proceedings before the arbitral forum and tribunal informed findings on the corporate debtor's conduct and intention, and the appellate challenge was dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.