Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (section reference omitted) was contested on date-of-default and limitation grounds but the dispute turned on an executed MOU, acknowledged receipt of funds, continuous failure to perform, and an arbitral award rendered as an executable decree. The award's finality and enforceability was treated as operative for limitation (a subsequent suo motu writ order was invoked in support). Non appearance and ex parte proceedings before the arbitral forum and tribunal informed findings on the corporate debtor's conduct and intention, and the appellate challenge was dismissed as lacking merit.
Admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (section reference omitted) was contested on date-of-default and limitation grounds but the dispute turned on an executed MOU, acknowledged receipt of funds, continuous failure to perform, and an arbitral award rendered as an executable decree. The award's finality and enforceability was treated as operative for limitation (a subsequent suo motu writ order was invoked in support). Non appearance and ex parte proceedings before the arbitral forum and tribunal informed findings on the corporate debtor's conduct and intention, and the appellate challenge was dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.