Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (section reference omitted) was contested on date-of-default and limitation grounds but the dispute turned on an executed MOU, acknowledged receipt of funds, continuous failure to perform, and an arbitral award rendered as an executable decree. The award's finality and enforceability was treated as operative for limitation (a subsequent suo motu writ order was invoked in support). Non appearance and ex parte proceedings before the arbitral forum and tribunal informed findings on the corporate debtor's conduct and intention, and the appellate challenge was dismissed as lacking merit.
Admission under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (section reference omitted) was contested on date-of-default and limitation grounds but the dispute turned on an executed MOU, acknowledged receipt of funds, continuous failure to perform, and an arbitral award rendered as an executable decree. The award's finality and enforceability was treated as operative for limitation (a subsequent suo motu writ order was invoked in support). Non appearance and ex parte proceedings before the arbitral forum and tribunal informed findings on the corporate debtor's conduct and intention, and the appellate challenge was dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.