Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Advance ruling application concerning whether hostel accommodation provided by the applicant's tenant qualifies as a residential dwelling and is exempt under Entry 12/12A was held inadmissible because the queries relate to supplies made by the tenant, not supplies by the applicant, and thus fall outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under the statute. The related question on whether in house food is a composite exempt supply was also rejected as dependent on the inadmissible queries. The applicability of case law to the applicant's facts was held outside permissible advance ruling questions, and any precedent evidence would not assist due to non binding provisions; application rejected under procedural admissibility rules.
Advance ruling application concerning whether hostel accommodation provided by the applicant's tenant qualifies as a residential dwelling and is exempt under Entry 12/12A was held inadmissible because the queries relate to supplies made by the tenant, not supplies by the applicant, and thus fall outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under the statute. The related question on whether in house food is a composite exempt supply was also rejected as dependent on the inadmissible queries. The applicability of case law to the applicant's facts was held outside permissible advance ruling questions, and any precedent evidence would not assist due to non binding provisions; application rejected under procedural admissibility rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.