Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Advance ruling application concerning whether hostel accommodation provided by the applicant's tenant qualifies as a residential dwelling and is exempt under Entry 12/12A was held inadmissible because the queries relate to supplies made by the tenant, not supplies by the applicant, and thus fall outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under the statute. The related question on whether in house food is a composite exempt supply was also rejected as dependent on the inadmissible queries. The applicability of case law to the applicant's facts was held outside permissible advance ruling questions, and any precedent evidence would not assist due to non binding provisions; application rejected under procedural admissibility rules.
Advance ruling application concerning whether hostel accommodation provided by the applicant's tenant qualifies as a residential dwelling and is exempt under Entry 12/12A was held inadmissible because the queries relate to supplies made by the tenant, not supplies by the applicant, and thus fall outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under the statute. The related question on whether in house food is a composite exempt supply was also rejected as dependent on the inadmissible queries. The applicability of case law to the applicant's facts was held outside permissible advance ruling questions, and any precedent evidence would not assist due to non binding provisions; application rejected under procedural admissibility rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
