Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Advance ruling application concerning whether hostel accommodation provided by the applicant's tenant qualifies as a residential dwelling and is exempt under Entry 12/12A was held inadmissible because the queries relate to supplies made by the tenant, not supplies by the applicant, and thus fall outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under the statute. The related question on whether in house food is a composite exempt supply was also rejected as dependent on the inadmissible queries. The applicability of case law to the applicant's facts was held outside permissible advance ruling questions, and any precedent evidence would not assist due to non binding provisions; application rejected under procedural admissibility rules.
Advance ruling application concerning whether hostel accommodation provided by the applicant's tenant qualifies as a residential dwelling and is exempt under Entry 12/12A was held inadmissible because the queries relate to supplies made by the tenant, not supplies by the applicant, and thus fall outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under the statute. The related question on whether in house food is a composite exempt supply was also rejected as dependent on the inadmissible queries. The applicability of case law to the applicant's facts was held outside permissible advance ruling questions, and any precedent evidence would not assist due to non binding provisions; application rejected under procedural admissibility rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.