Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
