Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
