Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.