Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
