Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) incorporating an ICDS adjustment was quashed by the jurisdictional High Court; consequently the ICDS adjustment cannot stand in the assessment computation and must be removed from the assessment under section 143(3). The tribunal directs the assessing officer to modify the total income in the assessment order to exclude the ICDS adjustment reflected in the quashed intimation, giving full consequential effect to the High Court quashing when finalising the assessment computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.