Imported cement concessional duty exemption under Notification 4/2006 challenged over RSP misdeclaration; demand, interest and s.114A penalty set asid...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7301 to 7320 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal upheld that the anti abuse provision concerning receipt of shares applies to allotment as well as receipt, rejecting the argument that shares must pre exist to attract tax. Applying a wide interpretation of 'receipt', the Tribunal followed precedent holding that shares come into existence on allotment and acquisition by allotment constitutes receipt for tax purposes; consequently the appellant's challenge to the addition under the anti abuse provision was dismissed and the assessment upheld.
The Tribunal upheld that the anti abuse provision concerning receipt of shares applies to allotment as well as receipt, rejecting the argument that shares must pre exist to attract tax. Applying a wide interpretation of 'receipt', the Tribunal followed precedent holding that shares come into existence on allotment and acquisition by allotment constitutes receipt for tax purposes; consequently the appellant's challenge to the addition under the anti abuse provision was dismissed and the assessment upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
