Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The Tribunal upheld that the anti abuse provision concerning receipt of shares applies to allotment as well as receipt, rejecting the argument that shares must pre exist to attract tax. Applying a wide interpretation of 'receipt', the Tribunal followed precedent holding that shares come into existence on allotment and acquisition by allotment constitutes receipt for tax purposes; consequently the appellant's challenge to the addition under the anti abuse provision was dismissed and the assessment upheld.
The Tribunal upheld that the anti abuse provision concerning receipt of shares applies to allotment as well as receipt, rejecting the argument that shares must pre exist to attract tax. Applying a wide interpretation of 'receipt', the Tribunal followed precedent holding that shares come into existence on allotment and acquisition by allotment constitutes receipt for tax purposes; consequently the appellant's challenge to the addition under the anti abuse provision was dismissed and the assessment upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
