Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
The Tribunal upheld that the anti abuse provision concerning receipt of shares applies to allotment as well as receipt, rejecting the argument that shares must pre exist to attract tax. Applying a wide interpretation of 'receipt', the Tribunal followed precedent holding that shares come into existence on allotment and acquisition by allotment constitutes receipt for tax purposes; consequently the appellant's challenge to the addition under the anti abuse provision was dismissed and the assessment upheld.
The Tribunal upheld that the anti abuse provision concerning receipt of shares applies to allotment as well as receipt, rejecting the argument that shares must pre exist to attract tax. Applying a wide interpretation of 'receipt', the Tribunal followed precedent holding that shares come into existence on allotment and acquisition by allotment constitutes receipt for tax purposes; consequently the appellant's challenge to the addition under the anti abuse provision was dismissed and the assessment upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.