Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Statutory pre-deposit as a condition precedent to preferring an appeal must be complied with and non compliance renders an appeal liable to dismissal; where an efficacious statutory remedy exists, a writ petition challenging dismissal for failure to make the pre deposit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Payments made by one party cannot be set off or appropriated against another distinct party's statutory pre deposit obligation; separate liabilities remain. Failure to comply with pre deposit cannot be remedied by approaching the writ court absent changed circumstances, and the writ petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.
Statutory pre-deposit as a condition precedent to preferring an appeal must be complied with and non compliance renders an appeal liable to dismissal; where an efficacious statutory remedy exists, a writ petition challenging dismissal for failure to make the pre deposit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Payments made by one party cannot be set off or appropriated against another distinct party's statutory pre deposit obligation; separate liabilities remain. Failure to comply with pre deposit cannot be remedied by approaching the writ court absent changed circumstances, and the writ petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.