Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6121 to 6140 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Statutory pre-deposit as a condition precedent to preferring an appeal must be complied with and non compliance renders an appeal liable to dismissal; where an efficacious statutory remedy exists, a writ petition challenging dismissal for failure to make the pre deposit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Payments made by one party cannot be set off or appropriated against another distinct party's statutory pre deposit obligation; separate liabilities remain. Failure to comply with pre deposit cannot be remedied by approaching the writ court absent changed circumstances, and the writ petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.
Statutory pre-deposit as a condition precedent to preferring an appeal must be complied with and non compliance renders an appeal liable to dismissal; where an efficacious statutory remedy exists, a writ petition challenging dismissal for failure to make the pre deposit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Payments made by one party cannot be set off or appropriated against another distinct party's statutory pre deposit obligation; separate liabilities remain. Failure to comply with pre deposit cannot be remedied by approaching the writ court absent changed circumstances, and the writ petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.