Abuse of dominant position allegations against an exchange found not prima facie; regulator reliance on sectoral expertise upheld and no investigation...
Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Statutory pre-deposit as a condition precedent to preferring an appeal must be complied with and non compliance renders an appeal liable to dismissal; where an efficacious statutory remedy exists, a writ petition challenging dismissal for failure to make the pre deposit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Payments made by one party cannot be set off or appropriated against another distinct party's statutory pre deposit obligation; separate liabilities remain. Failure to comply with pre deposit cannot be remedied by approaching the writ court absent changed circumstances, and the writ petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.
Statutory pre-deposit as a condition precedent to preferring an appeal must be complied with and non compliance renders an appeal liable to dismissal; where an efficacious statutory remedy exists, a writ petition challenging dismissal for failure to make the pre deposit is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Payments made by one party cannot be set off or appropriated against another distinct party's statutory pre deposit obligation; separate liabilities remain. Failure to comply with pre deposit cannot be remedied by approaching the writ court absent changed circumstances, and the writ petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.