Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
The article argues that a proprietary concern cannot be treated...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and classification follows
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The article argues that a proprietary concern cannot be treated as an inter-connected undertaking with a partnership firm or body corporate; the concept of inter-connected undertakings applies to body corporates and requires specific legal nexus, not mere mutuality of interest. Applying that principle, the finding of relatedness between the manufacturer and its buyers is unsustainable, so invocation of transfer pricing rules for transaction value adjustment is unjustified. Classification of the goods as machinery under CETH 8471 is supported and the alternate classification is rejected. Alleged short payment for March 2017 is negated and extended limitation for demand is inapplicable on the facts.
The article argues that a proprietary concern cannot be treated as an inter-connected undertaking with a partnership firm or body corporate; the concept of inter-connected undertakings applies to body corporates and requires specific legal nexus, not mere mutuality of interest. Applying that principle, the finding of relatedness between the manufacturer and its buyers is unsustainable, so invocation of transfer pricing rules for transaction value adjustment is unjustified. Classification of the goods as machinery under CETH 8471 is supported and the alternate classification is rejected. Alleged short payment for March 2017 is negated and extended limitation for demand is inapplicable on the facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
