Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
The article argues that a proprietary concern cannot be treated...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and classification follows
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The article argues that a proprietary concern cannot be treated as an inter-connected undertaking with a partnership firm or body corporate; the concept of inter-connected undertakings applies to body corporates and requires specific legal nexus, not mere mutuality of interest. Applying that principle, the finding of relatedness between the manufacturer and its buyers is unsustainable, so invocation of transfer pricing rules for transaction value adjustment is unjustified. Classification of the goods as machinery under CETH 8471 is supported and the alternate classification is rejected. Alleged short payment for March 2017 is negated and extended limitation for demand is inapplicable on the facts.
The article argues that a proprietary concern cannot be treated as an inter-connected undertaking with a partnership firm or body corporate; the concept of inter-connected undertakings applies to body corporates and requires specific legal nexus, not mere mutuality of interest. Applying that principle, the finding of relatedness between the manufacturer and its buyers is unsustainable, so invocation of transfer pricing rules for transaction value adjustment is unjustified. Classification of the goods as machinery under CETH 8471 is supported and the alternate classification is rejected. Alleged short payment for March 2017 is negated and extended limitation for demand is inapplicable on the facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.