Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Failure to specifically deny allegations in the written statement constitutes an admission under Order VIII Rules 3 and 5, permitting the court under Order XII Rule 6 to act on such admissions and treating admitted facts as substantive evidence without proof under Section 58 of the Evidence Act; consequence: petitioner entitled to relief on undisputed claim. The Bill Verification Committee must afford audi alteram partem when proposing to reduce or reject bills, especially on allegations of fraud or inflated claims; consequence: an ex parte bill verification report quashed. Remedy ordered: respondents directed to liquidate the undisputed dues within eight weeks, failing which interest at 6% per annum applies.
Failure to specifically deny allegations in the written statement constitutes an admission under Order VIII Rules 3 and 5, permitting the court under Order XII Rule 6 to act on such admissions and treating admitted facts as substantive evidence without proof under Section 58 of the Evidence Act; consequence: petitioner entitled to relief on undisputed claim. The Bill Verification Committee must afford audi alteram partem when proposing to reduce or reject bills, especially on allegations of fraud or inflated claims; consequence: an ex parte bill verification report quashed. Remedy ordered: respondents directed to liquidate the undisputed dues within eight weeks, failing which interest at 6% per annum applies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
