Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Application challenged denial of exemption under Section 11 for a public charitable trust due to 50 day delay in filing Form 10B; court found the filing requirement to be procedural and subject to substantial compliance, quashed the impugned administrative rejection, and condoned the 50 day delay. The court held that Section 119(2)(b) must be liberally construed to prevent genuine hardship to beneficiaries and that administrative discretion must not be influenced by non existent conditions. Consequence: the Form 10B is to be treated as filed in time and the income tax return processed within three months.
Application challenged denial of exemption under Section 11 for a public charitable trust due to 50 day delay in filing Form 10B; court found the filing requirement to be procedural and subject to substantial compliance, quashed the impugned administrative rejection, and condoned the 50 day delay. The court held that Section 119(2)(b) must be liberally construed to prevent genuine hardship to beneficiaries and that administrative discretion must not be influenced by non existent conditions. Consequence: the Form 10B is to be treated as filed in time and the income tax return processed within three months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.