Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Application challenged denial of exemption under Section 11 for a public charitable trust due to 50 day delay in filing Form 10B; court found the filing requirement to be procedural and subject to substantial compliance, quashed the impugned administrative rejection, and condoned the 50 day delay. The court held that Section 119(2)(b) must be liberally construed to prevent genuine hardship to beneficiaries and that administrative discretion must not be influenced by non existent conditions. Consequence: the Form 10B is to be treated as filed in time and the income tax return processed within three months.
Application challenged denial of exemption under Section 11 for a public charitable trust due to 50 day delay in filing Form 10B; court found the filing requirement to be procedural and subject to substantial compliance, quashed the impugned administrative rejection, and condoned the 50 day delay. The court held that Section 119(2)(b) must be liberally construed to prevent genuine hardship to beneficiaries and that administrative discretion must not be influenced by non existent conditions. Consequence: the Form 10B is to be treated as filed in time and the income tax return processed within three months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.