Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Claim for deduction under Section 80-IA is rejected by Revenue because agreement was with a corporate and the fuel farm lay outside airport premises; court finds the agreement was with a statutory airport authority and that the fuel farm is an integral component of airport operations, so the requisite conditions for the 80-IA benefit are satisfied and the deduction is allowable. On interest deductibility under Section 36(1)(iii) for hedge (swap) transactions, the Tribunal's application of the controlling Supreme Court precedent supports allowance of the interest expense, and Revenue does not contest that applicability.
Claim for deduction under Section 80-IA is rejected by Revenue because agreement was with a corporate and the fuel farm lay outside airport premises; court finds the agreement was with a statutory airport authority and that the fuel farm is an integral component of airport operations, so the requisite conditions for the 80-IA benefit are satisfied and the deduction is allowable. On interest deductibility under Section 36(1)(iii) for hedge (swap) transactions, the Tribunal's application of the controlling Supreme Court precedent supports allowance of the interest expense, and Revenue does not contest that applicability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
