Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issuance of shares to existing promoters was examined under section 56(2)(viib) with the central question being proper determination of fair market value (FMV). ITAT held that the assessing officer could not substitute the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method adopted under Rule 11UA and that the DCF valuation was based on reasonable assumptions, accordingly the premium was not excessive and the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was deleted. ITAT further held that no allegation of unaccounted funds existed so the related party infusion could not be taxed as deemed income; application of the NAV method produced an even higher FMV.
Issuance of shares to existing promoters was examined under section 56(2)(viib) with the central question being proper determination of fair market value (FMV). ITAT held that the assessing officer could not substitute the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method adopted under Rule 11UA and that the DCF valuation was based on reasonable assumptions, accordingly the premium was not excessive and the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was deleted. ITAT further held that no allegation of unaccounted funds existed so the related party infusion could not be taxed as deemed income; application of the NAV method produced an even higher FMV.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
