Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Issuance of shares to existing promoters was examined under section 56(2)(viib) with the central question being proper determination of fair market value (FMV). ITAT held that the assessing officer could not substitute the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method adopted under Rule 11UA and that the DCF valuation was based on reasonable assumptions, accordingly the premium was not excessive and the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was deleted. ITAT further held that no allegation of unaccounted funds existed so the related party infusion could not be taxed as deemed income; application of the NAV method produced an even higher FMV.
Issuance of shares to existing promoters was examined under section 56(2)(viib) with the central question being proper determination of fair market value (FMV). ITAT held that the assessing officer could not substitute the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method adopted under Rule 11UA and that the DCF valuation was based on reasonable assumptions, accordingly the premium was not excessive and the addition under section 56(2)(viib) was deleted. ITAT further held that no allegation of unaccounted funds existed so the related party infusion could not be taxed as deemed income; application of the NAV method produced an even higher FMV.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
