Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5281 to 5300 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of joss powder under customs tariff was contested: the tribunal applied Note 1(a) to Chapter 44 and concluded that only wood powders used primarily for perfumery or medicinal purposes fall under the exclusion to Chapter 44, while products lacking essential perfumery or medical characteristics are not classifiable under the plant products heading and therefore attract Chapter 44 classification; outcome: remand to verify eligibility to Notification No.46/2011 and challenge to classification allowed. On limitation, the tribunal held that an extended five year demand requires collusion, willful misstatement or suppression and that the SCN issued after one year was time barred; outcome: impugned order set aside and appeals allowed with consequential benefits.
Classification of joss powder under customs tariff was contested: the tribunal applied Note 1(a) to Chapter 44 and concluded that only wood powders used primarily for perfumery or medicinal purposes fall under the exclusion to Chapter 44, while products lacking essential perfumery or medical characteristics are not classifiable under the plant products heading and therefore attract Chapter 44 classification; outcome: remand to verify eligibility to Notification No.46/2011 and challenge to classification allowed. On limitation, the tribunal held that an extended five year demand requires collusion, willful misstatement or suppression and that the SCN issued after one year was time barred; outcome: impugned order set aside and appeals allowed with consequential benefits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
