Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The liquidator's Process Information Document reserves broad discretion to reject bids and to annul and recommence an e auction to maximise realisation; the Court found that re auction with a higher reserve price may serve value maximisation and stakeholder interest, and that the liquidator may move the appellate tribunal for relief. The High Court declined to entertain the petition and an application to recall its prior order, noting the prior order recorded the liquidator's undertaking to approach the appellate forum and that NCLAT/NCLT have regulatory jurisdiction to decide annulment, re auction and objections. The petition was disposed accordingly.
The liquidator's Process Information Document reserves broad discretion to reject bids and to annul and recommence an e auction to maximise realisation; the Court found that re auction with a higher reserve price may serve value maximisation and stakeholder interest, and that the liquidator may move the appellate tribunal for relief. The High Court declined to entertain the petition and an application to recall its prior order, noting the prior order recorded the liquidator's undertaking to approach the appellate forum and that NCLAT/NCLT have regulatory jurisdiction to decide annulment, re auction and objections. The petition was disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.