Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An operational creditor that submitted a resolution plan and exercised voting rights to approve its own plan breached the statutory prohibition on interested parties voting, creating a conflict of interest and applying nemo judex in causa sua to find the CoC decision void for material irregularity; the approval was vitiated for violating principles of natural justice. The Resolution Professional failed in its duty to flag the conflict and statutory bar, warranting IBBI notice and remedial action. Because the statutory framework does not accommodate this situation, the Tribunal found the plan invalid and concluded liquidation is the only viable outcome for the corporate debtor.
An operational creditor that submitted a resolution plan and exercised voting rights to approve its own plan breached the statutory prohibition on interested parties voting, creating a conflict of interest and applying nemo judex in causa sua to find the CoC decision void for material irregularity; the approval was vitiated for violating principles of natural justice. The Resolution Professional failed in its duty to flag the conflict and statutory bar, warranting IBBI notice and remedial action. Because the statutory framework does not accommodate this situation, the Tribunal found the plan invalid and concluded liquidation is the only viable outcome for the corporate debtor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.