Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Maintainability of a petition under insolvency law against a...
Maintainability of a Section 7 insolvency petition against a financial service provider denied; appeal dismissed for non maintainability and complex dispute
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Maintainability of a petition under insolvency law against a corporate debtor functioning as a financial service provider was denied because the disputed transactions arose when the respondent operated as an NBFC and involved complex, collusive, and related party dealings subsumed by a settlement agreement. The tribunal found the loan claim treated within the settlement and framed as a recovery arrangement, with pervasive factual and legal disputes rendering the petition non maintainable; consequently the financial creditor's appeal was dismissed and the Section 7 petition could not be admitted.
Maintainability of a petition under insolvency law against a corporate debtor functioning as a financial service provider was denied because the disputed transactions arose when the respondent operated as an NBFC and involved complex, collusive, and related party dealings subsumed by a settlement agreement. The tribunal found the loan claim treated within the settlement and framed as a recovery arrangement, with pervasive factual and legal disputes rendering the petition non maintainable; consequently the financial creditor's appeal was dismissed and the Section 7 petition could not be admitted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
