Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Under GST rules a revocation application requires prior filing of returns and payment of dues; limitation exists to ensure statutory compliance and protect third party rights, but cancellation of GST registration typically prejudices only the assessee and not third parties. The writ court may condone delay in statutory or quasi judicial proceedings, and on that basis the High Court set aside the dismissal of the appeal for limitation and directed the Appellate Authority to re hear and decide the revocation of cancellation on merits, permitting reconsideration rather than rejection on time bar grounds.
Under GST rules a revocation application requires prior filing of returns and payment of dues; limitation exists to ensure statutory compliance and protect third party rights, but cancellation of GST registration typically prejudices only the assessee and not third parties. The writ court may condone delay in statutory or quasi judicial proceedings, and on that basis the High Court set aside the dismissal of the appeal for limitation and directed the Appellate Authority to re hear and decide the revocation of cancellation on merits, permitting reconsideration rather than rejection on time bar grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.