Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Show-cause notices for cancellation of GST registration were found to breach the principles of natural justice by denying respondents an opportunity to reply and to present documents, and by omitting required physical verification procedures under the CGST Rules; those procedural defects vitiated the final orders and warranted quashing. The availability of an efficacious statutory appeal did not cure the denial of a hearing, and appellate remit powers were not treated as substituting for the Assessing Authority's mandatory compliance. The impugned notices and orders are set aside; fresh proceedings may be initiated only after strict compliance with the prescribed registration cancellation procedure.
Show-cause notices for cancellation of GST registration were found to breach the principles of natural justice by denying respondents an opportunity to reply and to present documents, and by omitting required physical verification procedures under the CGST Rules; those procedural defects vitiated the final orders and warranted quashing. The availability of an efficacious statutory appeal did not cure the denial of a hearing, and appellate remit powers were not treated as substituting for the Assessing Authority's mandatory compliance. The impugned notices and orders are set aside; fresh proceedings may be initiated only after strict compliance with the prescribed registration cancellation procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.