Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Show cause proceedings under Section 73 were invalidated because the Statement of determination attached to the summary FORM GST DRC-01 cannot substitute a Show Cause Notice issued by the Proper Officer; consequently initiation and the impugned order were quashed. The court held that Show Cause Notice, Statement and Order under Section 73 must be issued by the Proper Officer and authenticated per Rule 26(3), and failure to afford opportunity of hearing violated Section 75(4). The court granted liberty to reinitiate proceedings de novo and excluded the period from summary issuance to service of certified judgment for computation under Section 73(10).
Show cause proceedings under Section 73 were invalidated because the Statement of determination attached to the summary FORM GST DRC-01 cannot substitute a Show Cause Notice issued by the Proper Officer; consequently initiation and the impugned order were quashed. The court held that Show Cause Notice, Statement and Order under Section 73 must be issued by the Proper Officer and authenticated per Rule 26(3), and failure to afford opportunity of hearing violated Section 75(4). The court granted liberty to reinitiate proceedings de novo and excluded the period from summary issuance to service of certified judgment for computation under Section 73(10).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.