Imported cement concessional duty exemption under Notification 4/2006 challenged over RSP misdeclaration; demand, interest and s.114A penalty set asid...
Body-worn camera recordings for Customs baggage checks: new SOP mandates full passenger-interaction capture, secure storage, privacy safeguards, stric...
Pre-existing dispute concerning supply of contaminated goods communicated via agents was found to constitute a notice of dispute under Section 9(5)(ii)(d) and satisfy the Mobilox plausibility threshold; these communications required consideration and could not be dismissed as spurious, so the Section 9 application should have been rejected. The Adjudicating Authority erred in admitting the Section 9 petition and initiating CIRP; the admission and all consequential orders are set aside, the corporate debtor is released from CIRP, a directed interim payment is to be made, and the operational creditor and third parties remain free to pursue other legal remedies.
Pre-existing dispute concerning supply of contaminated goods communicated via agents was found to constitute a notice of dispute under Section 9(5)(ii)(d) and satisfy the Mobilox plausibility threshold; these communications required consideration and could not be dismissed as spurious, so the Section 9 application should have been rejected. The Adjudicating Authority erred in admitting the Section 9 petition and initiating CIRP; the admission and all consequential orders are set aside, the corporate debtor is released from CIRP, a directed interim payment is to be made, and the operational creditor and third parties remain free to pursue other legal remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.