Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revocation of courier registration, forfeiture of security and penalty were effected under the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2010, not under the Customs Act; therefore section 129A appeal jurisdiction to the Tribunal does not arise. The tribunal contrasted the express provision in the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 permitting appeals under section 129A for brokers, to show that the 2010 Regulations provide exclusive remedial machinery and do not confer a statutory right of appeal to the Tribunal. Consequently an appeal under section 129A against a revocation under the 2010 Regulations was held not maintainable and dismissed.
Revocation of courier registration, forfeiture of security and penalty were effected under the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2010, not under the Customs Act; therefore section 129A appeal jurisdiction to the Tribunal does not arise. The tribunal contrasted the express provision in the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 permitting appeals under section 129A for brokers, to show that the 2010 Regulations provide exclusive remedial machinery and do not confer a statutory right of appeal to the Tribunal. Consequently an appeal under section 129A against a revocation under the 2010 Regulations was held not maintainable and dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.