Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Revocation of courier registration, forfeiture of security and penalty were effected under the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2010, not under the Customs Act; therefore section 129A appeal jurisdiction to the Tribunal does not arise. The tribunal contrasted the express provision in the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 permitting appeals under section 129A for brokers, to show that the 2010 Regulations provide exclusive remedial machinery and do not confer a statutory right of appeal to the Tribunal. Consequently an appeal under section 129A against a revocation under the 2010 Regulations was held not maintainable and dismissed.
Revocation of courier registration, forfeiture of security and penalty were effected under the Courier Imports and Exports (Electronic Declaration and Processing) Regulations, 2010, not under the Customs Act; therefore section 129A appeal jurisdiction to the Tribunal does not arise. The tribunal contrasted the express provision in the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 permitting appeals under section 129A for brokers, to show that the 2010 Regulations provide exclusive remedial machinery and do not confer a statutory right of appeal to the Tribunal. Consequently an appeal under section 129A against a revocation under the 2010 Regulations was held not maintainable and dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
