Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Invocation of the guarantee was held to be a condition precedent to initiating insolvency proceedings against a personal guarantor; contractual terms of the deed govern guarantor liability and were not altered by a subsequent compromise or MoU, so settlement did not remove the need to invoke the guarantee. A demand notice in Form B without prior invocation cannot substitute as invocation; reliance on Rule 7(1) notice was rejected. Because the financial creditor failed to invoke the guarantee before issuing Form B, the Section 95 application was held maintainable only if invocation had occurred and the admission was set aside; appeals allowed.
Invocation of the guarantee was held to be a condition precedent to initiating insolvency proceedings against a personal guarantor; contractual terms of the deed govern guarantor liability and were not altered by a subsequent compromise or MoU, so settlement did not remove the need to invoke the guarantee. A demand notice in Form B without prior invocation cannot substitute as invocation; reliance on Rule 7(1) notice was rejected. Because the financial creditor failed to invoke the guarantee before issuing Form B, the Section 95 application was held maintainable only if invocation had occurred and the admission was set aside; appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
