Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Initiation of CIRP was upheld because unsecured loans were actually disbursed to the corporate debtor, obliging the Adjudicating Authority to admit the Section 7 petition; the appeal that initiation was illegal was rejected. Related party or subsidiary links did not bar the financial creditors from lending, so related party status did not vitiate claims and the challenge to liquidation and e auctions failed. The Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom and the Adjudicating Authority's evaluation under the Code were treated as non justiciable and final, so liquidation steps and waterfall distribution were sustained. Exorbitant interest was disallowed though principal liability remained enforceable.
Initiation of CIRP was upheld because unsecured loans were actually disbursed to the corporate debtor, obliging the Adjudicating Authority to admit the Section 7 petition; the appeal that initiation was illegal was rejected. Related party or subsidiary links did not bar the financial creditors from lending, so related party status did not vitiate claims and the challenge to liquidation and e auctions failed. The Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom and the Adjudicating Authority's evaluation under the Code were treated as non justiciable and final, so liquidation steps and waterfall distribution were sustained. Exorbitant interest was disallowed though principal liability remained enforceable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
