Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal and exhaustion of alternative remedy was held decisive against writ jurisdiction: post-decisional hearing under the Regulation satisfies audi alteram partem and absence of pre-hearing did not amount to jurisdictional breach, so writ relief was inappropriate. Orders rejecting objections to assessment and penalty were not shown to be jurisdictionally invalid and must be challenged via the statutory appellate route. Records of pre-August 19, 2025 writs are to be transferred to the Appellate Tribunal for disposal without insisting on pre-deposit; petitions filed on or after that date are dismissed for alternative remedy, with limitation issues left to the Tribunal.
Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal and exhaustion of alternative remedy was held decisive against writ jurisdiction: post-decisional hearing under the Regulation satisfies audi alteram partem and absence of pre-hearing did not amount to jurisdictional breach, so writ relief was inappropriate. Orders rejecting objections to assessment and penalty were not shown to be jurisdictionally invalid and must be challenged via the statutory appellate route. Records of pre-August 19, 2025 writs are to be transferred to the Appellate Tribunal for disposal without insisting on pre-deposit; petitions filed on or after that date are dismissed for alternative remedy, with limitation issues left to the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.