Abuse of dominant position allegations against an exchange found not prima facie; regulator reliance on sectoral expertise upheld and no investigation...
Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Validity of electronically issued assessment orders was contested for absence of a DIN and unsigned show cause notices; the HC recorded that the assessment carried a portal-generated Reference No (auto-assigned and exclusive to that assessment) and rejected the challenge to electronic issuance on that basis. The HC also found the petitioner aware of assessment action and unable to explain delay between appeal rejection and writ filing; on the ground of laches the writ petition was dismissed. No substantive grounds raised in the petition were sustained.
Validity of electronically issued assessment orders was contested for absence of a DIN and unsigned show cause notices; the HC recorded that the assessment carried a portal-generated Reference No (auto-assigned and exclusive to that assessment) and rejected the challenge to electronic issuance on that basis. The HC also found the petitioner aware of assessment action and unable to explain delay between appeal rejection and writ filing; on the ground of laches the writ petition was dismissed. No substantive grounds raised in the petition were sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.