Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of electronically issued assessment orders was contested for absence of a DIN and unsigned show cause notices; the HC recorded that the assessment carried a portal-generated Reference No (auto-assigned and exclusive to that assessment) and rejected the challenge to electronic issuance on that basis. The HC also found the petitioner aware of assessment action and unable to explain delay between appeal rejection and writ filing; on the ground of laches the writ petition was dismissed. No substantive grounds raised in the petition were sustained.
Validity of electronically issued assessment orders was contested for absence of a DIN and unsigned show cause notices; the HC recorded that the assessment carried a portal-generated Reference No (auto-assigned and exclusive to that assessment) and rejected the challenge to electronic issuance on that basis. The HC also found the petitioner aware of assessment action and unable to explain delay between appeal rejection and writ filing; on the ground of laches the writ petition was dismissed. No substantive grounds raised in the petition were sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
