Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Summary attachments in GST DRC-01 do not replace a formal Show Cause Notice under Section 73; the Statement under s.73(3) is distinct and cannot substitute the s.73(1) notice, and initiation without a proper Show Cause Notice is invalid - resulting in quashing of the impugned order. Notices, Statements and orders under Section 73 must be issued and authenticated by the Proper Officer as defined and in accordance with Rule 26(3); failure to provide personal hearing under s.75(4) vitiated the order - relief granted, accounts defreezed, and liberty given to initiate de novo proceedings with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Summary attachments in GST DRC-01 do not replace a formal Show Cause Notice under Section 73; the Statement under s.73(3) is distinct and cannot substitute the s.73(1) notice, and initiation without a proper Show Cause Notice is invalid - resulting in quashing of the impugned order. Notices, Statements and orders under Section 73 must be issued and authenticated by the Proper Officer as defined and in accordance with Rule 26(3); failure to provide personal hearing under s.75(4) vitiated the order - relief granted, accounts defreezed, and liberty given to initiate de novo proceedings with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
