Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Summary attachments in GST DRC-01 do not replace a formal Show Cause Notice under Section 73; the Statement under s.73(3) is distinct and cannot substitute the s.73(1) notice, and initiation without a proper Show Cause Notice is invalid - resulting in quashing of the impugned order. Notices, Statements and orders under Section 73 must be issued and authenticated by the Proper Officer as defined and in accordance with Rule 26(3); failure to provide personal hearing under s.75(4) vitiated the order - relief granted, accounts defreezed, and liberty given to initiate de novo proceedings with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Summary attachments in GST DRC-01 do not replace a formal Show Cause Notice under Section 73; the Statement under s.73(3) is distinct and cannot substitute the s.73(1) notice, and initiation without a proper Show Cause Notice is invalid - resulting in quashing of the impugned order. Notices, Statements and orders under Section 73 must be issued and authenticated by the Proper Officer as defined and in accordance with Rule 26(3); failure to provide personal hearing under s.75(4) vitiated the order - relief granted, accounts defreezed, and liberty given to initiate de novo proceedings with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.