Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The licence agreement is a binding contract whose express terms require timely payment of licence fee, GST and interest; the petitioner breached those obligations by accruing substantial arrears, and the court treated the GST obligation as a statutory levy not excluded by the contract-consequence: petitioner's confusion on GST rejected. The existence of an in contract dispute resolution/alternative remedy led the court to decline exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and dispose of the writ petition, while permitting the petitioner to pursue remedies provided in the agreement.
The licence agreement is a binding contract whose express terms require timely payment of licence fee, GST and interest; the petitioner breached those obligations by accruing substantial arrears, and the court treated the GST obligation as a statutory levy not excluded by the contract-consequence: petitioner's confusion on GST rejected. The existence of an in contract dispute resolution/alternative remedy led the court to decline exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and dispose of the writ petition, while permitting the petitioner to pursue remedies provided in the agreement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
