Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
The licence agreement is a binding contract whose express terms require timely payment of licence fee, GST and interest; the petitioner breached those obligations by accruing substantial arrears, and the court treated the GST obligation as a statutory levy not excluded by the contract-consequence: petitioner's confusion on GST rejected. The existence of an in contract dispute resolution/alternative remedy led the court to decline exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and dispose of the writ petition, while permitting the petitioner to pursue remedies provided in the agreement.
The licence agreement is a binding contract whose express terms require timely payment of licence fee, GST and interest; the petitioner breached those obligations by accruing substantial arrears, and the court treated the GST obligation as a statutory levy not excluded by the contract-consequence: petitioner's confusion on GST rejected. The existence of an in contract dispute resolution/alternative remedy led the court to decline exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and dispose of the writ petition, while permitting the petitioner to pursue remedies provided in the agreement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
