Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Admissibility of an advance ruling was denied because identical questions were already subject to departmental scrutiny and adjudication, so the proviso barring applications where proceedings are pending applied. The applicant filed an online application after the assessing officer issued a GST assessment notice and only completed manual submission years later after insistence, failing to supply required enclosures timely under prescribed filing procedures. The adjudication established demands following return mismatches and confirmed tax liability arising from claiming the enhanced threshold exemption while remaining voluntarily registered and not remitting tax. Consequence: the advance ruling application is rejected as inadmissible.
Admissibility of an advance ruling was denied because identical questions were already subject to departmental scrutiny and adjudication, so the proviso barring applications where proceedings are pending applied. The applicant filed an online application after the assessing officer issued a GST assessment notice and only completed manual submission years later after insistence, failing to supply required enclosures timely under prescribed filing procedures. The adjudication established demands following return mismatches and confirmed tax liability arising from claiming the enhanced threshold exemption while remaining voluntarily registered and not remitting tax. Consequence: the advance ruling application is rejected as inadmissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.