Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Stock-in-trade land sale cannot attract section 50C where the transaction is already accepted as business income.
    Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
    Retrospective omission of specified domestic transaction provision invalidated transfer pricing adjustment and confirmed SEZ deduction eligibility.
    Statutory exemption for Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee income cannot be denied because of an incorrect PAN status entry.
    Amalgamation bars continuation of tax deductions under sections 80IA and 80JJAA when business is transferred by reorganisation.
    Article 8 India-France DTAA: collection charges taxable, while technical handling income, interest and commission stayed within treaty protection.
    Alternate remedy bars customs writs; non-communication of time extension under Section 28(9) was not fatal.
    Preferential duty benefit under a free trade agreement cannot rest on a superseded public notice; reassessment ordered.
    DIN compliance in departmental orders is mandatory; an order issued without it was set aside and remanded.
    Strict construction of customs exemption and prospective IGST interest levy shape duty, classification, and penalty relief.
    Declared value, re-assessment, and confiscation principles: Tribunal upholds value redetermination but rejects section 28 recovery and penalty.
    Cross-examination and corroboration are essential before penalty for alleged smuggling facilitation can be sustained.
    Mistake apparent from record was not shown in provisional release conditions; rectification was refused, with clarification left open.
    Res judicata and continuing liquidation justified retention of premises; no summary order could compel surrender of tenancy rights.
    Resolution plan verification powers rest with the resolution professional; admitted homebuyer claims could not be reopened belatedly.
    Resolution plan review is limited to transparency and statutory compliance, not commercial wisdom, when disclosure is materially flawed.
    CoC-approved resolution plans are binding before adjudication; withdrawal after submission is impermissible and the approval application was revived.
    Service tax liability cannot rest on Form 26AS data; extended limitation also failed for want of statutory conditions.
    Service tax demand based only on Form 26AS failed where taxability, exemption and extended limitation were not properly established.
    Free warranty replacements and damaged inputs: Tribunal rejects duty demand where warranty value was already built into final product pricing.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Advance ruling sought on eligibility for refund of unutilised...

Advance ruling on refund of unutilised input tax credit for inverted duty structure: application rejected as out of scope and inadmissible

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST February 11, 2026 Case Laws AAR
Advance ruling sought on eligibility for refund of unutilised input tax credit arising from an inverted duty structure for manufacture and outward supply of cotton yarn; AAR holds that refund query falls outside the enumerated matters under the provision governing advance rulings and is therefore not maintainable, resulting in rejection of the application. AAR further finds the application inadmissible because the applicant is a consultant raising questions on behalf of a client and the question does not relate to supplies undertaken or proposed by the applicant; outcome: application liable to be rejected. AAR notes advance rulings may be void ab initio if obtained by fraud or suppression and that rulings bind the applicant and concerned officer.

Topics

Acts Income Tax