Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Addition for alleged bogus accommodation entries was limited by the tribunal to a specified percentage following precedent, so the excess addition was restricted. Depreciation denial was overturned because the assessing officer doubted asset valuation without rejecting books of account or providing valuation basis; surmatory estimates by survey personnel were held insufficient, restoring depreciation. Denial of deduction as a result of delayed return filing was treated as procedural rather than fundamental when the assessee gave reasonable cause and filed Form 10CCB on time, permitting the claim.
Addition for alleged bogus accommodation entries was limited by the tribunal to a specified percentage following precedent, so the excess addition was restricted. Depreciation denial was overturned because the assessing officer doubted asset valuation without rejecting books of account or providing valuation basis; surmatory estimates by survey personnel were held insufficient, restoring depreciation. Denial of deduction as a result of delayed return filing was treated as procedural rather than fundamental when the assessee gave reasonable cause and filed Form 10CCB on time, permitting the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.