Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Power to summon under Section 70 of the CGST Act permits issuance of summons for inquiry and such attendance does not by itself constitute arrest or illegal detention; therefore no seven day prior notice is mandated by Section 70 and Order XVI C.P.C. requirement was held inapplicable. The petitioner attended and acknowledged multiple summonses without objection, was allowed mobile access and voluntary presence at GST Bhavan, and only upon ascertainment of involvement was arrested and produced before a Magistrate. The claim for compensation for alleged illegal detention was rejected and the petition dismissed.
Power to summon under Section 70 of the CGST Act permits issuance of summons for inquiry and such attendance does not by itself constitute arrest or illegal detention; therefore no seven day prior notice is mandated by Section 70 and Order XVI C.P.C. requirement was held inapplicable. The petitioner attended and acknowledged multiple summonses without objection, was allowed mobile access and voluntary presence at GST Bhavan, and only upon ascertainment of involvement was arrested and produced before a Magistrate. The claim for compensation for alleged illegal detention was rejected and the petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
